5 ms·
I don’t think it matters of you hold the animal because it’s more of a symbolic thing, as in the cat as a symbol has a certain culturally ingrained meaning, see
by ulisesrmzroche 6y ago
I don’t think it matters of you hold the animal because it’s more of a symbolic thing, as in the cat as a symbol has a certain culturally ingrained meaning, see: cats are usually a Godess. Tigers are Gods. Feminine/Masculine. Women prefer masculine men. You said it yourself with the teacup poodle example
If a straight or lesbian woman or even a gay man identifies as a cat person, they still find you more attractive if you have a dog. Male beauty is judged to a different standard
- dwd 6y agoI would probably disagree on that I would attribute it to an vestigial evolutionary trait rather than a learned or subjective ideal. Cuddling a cat could evoke a man as nurturer, where standing with a dog (a real doggy dog) is evokes the hunter/protector. Comparing a tiger to a cat would require the person having knowledge of tigers which wouldn't be universal if you go back a few centuries, so that would have to be a learned/cultural idea. Or in saying that you're just trolling a life-long Geelong Cats supporter who watched their team lose the Richmond Tigers in the AFL Grand Final last night?
- ulisesrmzroche 6y agoI think ppl are offended cus the science is telling then something they don’t want to hear...so the science must be wrong