4 ms·
There was significant precedent on the 2A, I did read Heller, and happened to do my university thesis on US Constitutional and Legal History. Mine was a crim pr
by evgen 6y ago
There was significant precedent on the 2A, I did read Heller, and happened to do my university thesis on US Constitutional and Legal History. Mine was a crim pro focus but still trod similar ground back in the early 90s when Miller and Lewis were the precedents to cite, and a significant part of the years of coursework and months of research was going to actual source on things like what was meant by certain terms and supporting material in the time they were written. I assure you that I know more about this subject than you or whatever NRA pamphlet you last read on the subject. Heller is an embarrassment to Scalia's carefully cultivated image and will eventually be viewed as his Dred Scott.
- jki275 6y agoIt's funny people can write papers on things and then believe they know better than a sitting SCOTUS justice who is known for NOT being a judicial activist. Your politics are showing through. It's okay, you're not a judge and won't be. I don't read "NRA Pamphlets", I read Heller numerous times. I've studied just about everything that's been written on the 2nd Amendment. Dred Scott removed rights from people. Heller applied the document as it was meant to be, enforcing the Constitution.