4 ms·

>Are you justifying China for eradicating a whole culture and its people due to some extremist attacks? The US tried to justify over a decade of slaughter of t

>Are you justifying China for eradicating a whole culture and its people due to some extremist attacks? The US tried to justify over a decade of slaughter of terrorists and innocent bystanders abroad as a reaction to one terror attack on US soil. Don't try to play word games here. None of this is actually justified. All countries are guilty of crimes. The question I am posing people to consider is this: If several 9/11's happened on american soil. Buildings toppled, hundreds slaughtered by terrorism in multiple events with no end in sight and we find that the origin of these attacks rather than being instigated by one man from abroad is instigated by parts of a cultural community within US soil. What is the action that should be taken here to completely shut down this problem once and for all? Not a rhetorical question. I want some serious answers, but at the same time I also know that there is likely no solid answer and every action taken has a compromise. Also keep in mind this is not a justification of ANY chinese action. None of it is justified.

DevKoala 6y ago
9/11 was Al Qaeda from Pakistán. The USA didn’t have a war with Pakistan over a radical terrorist group.
- lerptime 6y ago
  Is Chinas' reaction also not a response to terrorism? Also by war he likely doesn't mean "official" declaration of war by the vocal cords of the US president. He likely means a more physical form of war by means using soldiers, bullets and bombs to conduct mass slaughter. That kind of war.
  - DevKoala 6y ago
    Killing millions of people is not a proper response to and isolated terrorist act. Moreover you are trying to justify the suffering of people by using some hypothetical scenario that hasn’t occurred.
    - lerptime 6y ago
      > Moreover you are trying to justify the suffering of people by using some hypothetical scenario that hasn’t occurred. I don't think he's justifying anything. He's questioning the nature of this world where a clear black and white decision is not always possible. He is saying in this case could there be No justifiable action possible? The hypothetical scenario is likely to help you empathize with the events from the chinese perspective. You cannot relate to the people reacting to terrorism in China. However, by envisioning a similar/equivalent scenario in your own country can possibly help you identify with the situation from their perspective. That is the purpose of the hypothetical. The question still stands if the posed equivalent situation was happening in America, what is the appropriate response? I don't know how to answer his question, do you? >Killing millions of people is not a proper response to and isolated terrorist act Don't play with words here. Millions are missing in concentration camps getting reeducated, this isn't actual genocide. This is not equivalent to sending the military to another country and conducting actual killings. What China is doing is still atrocious but quite different then literal slaughter. Also it's not a response to one isolated incident. Several terrorism acts with hundreds slaughtered and no end in sight is what is actually going on. I don't think you would call several 9/11's happening on american soil isolated terrorist attacks. Perhaps terrorism attacks in China seem isolated to you but this is not the case to a Chinese person.
      - DevKoala 6y ago
        You keep comparing apples to oranges in order to fabricate an argument. There is no systemic genocide perpetrated by the USA. Maybe if you believed in your argument you’d reply with your real account, not a green one.
        nerdtime 6y ago
        >Maybe if you believed in your argument you’d reply with your real account, not a green one. Looking at his karma which is barely anything in all accounts likely he has no real account. Also the usage of other accounts is likely a symptom of a post limit. Either he can respond to you with another account, or he can ignore you because he can't respond with the same account. Either way these actions are not sanctioned by the site. >You keep comparing apples to oranges in order to fabricate an argument. There is no systemic genocide perpetrated by the USA You can call it whatever you want. There was a sponsoring of troops by the US to slaughter people abroad for over a decade. Mass slaughter in the name of war rather than genocide. The chinese are not slaughtering people. They are putting them in concentration camps and educating them. Torture, Indoctrination and brainwashing are the more appropriate terms with the accurate sentiment. So yeah you're not wrong it is in way apples and oranges. Do you end terrorism by slaughtering terrorists? Or do you end terrorism by torturing, brainwashing and indoctrinating them? Pick the apple or the orange. Oh and in both cases there will be innocent bystanders affected.
- bleepblorp 6y ago
  15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens. US response towards Saudi can best be summarized as completely indifferent.

DevKoala 6y ago

9/11 was Al Qaeda from Pakistán. The USA didn’t have a war with Pakistan over a radical terrorist group.

lerptime 6y ago
Is Chinas' reaction also not a response to terrorism? Also by war he likely doesn't mean "official" declaration of war by the vocal cords of the US president. He likely means a more physical form of war by means using soldiers, bullets and bombs to conduct mass slaughter. That kind of war.
- DevKoala 6y ago
  Killing millions of people is not a proper response to and isolated terrorist act. Moreover you are trying to justify the suffering of people by using some hypothetical scenario that hasn’t occurred.
  - lerptime 6y ago
    > Moreover you are trying to justify the suffering of people by using some hypothetical scenario that hasn’t occurred. I don't think he's justifying anything. He's questioning the nature of this world where a clear black and white decision is not always possible. He is saying in this case could there be No justifiable action possible? The hypothetical scenario is likely to help you empathize with the events from the chinese perspective. You cannot relate to the people reacting to terrorism in China. However, by envisioning a similar/equivalent scenario in your own country can possibly help you identify with the situation from their perspective. That is the purpose of the hypothetical. The question still stands if the posed equivalent situation was happening in America, what is the appropriate response? I don't know how to answer his question, do you? >Killing millions of people is not a proper response to and isolated terrorist act Don't play with words here. Millions are missing in concentration camps getting reeducated, this isn't actual genocide. This is not equivalent to sending the military to another country and conducting actual killings. What China is doing is still atrocious but quite different then literal slaughter. Also it's not a response to one isolated incident. Several terrorism acts with hundreds slaughtered and no end in sight is what is actually going on. I don't think you would call several 9/11's happening on american soil isolated terrorist attacks. Perhaps terrorism attacks in China seem isolated to you but this is not the case to a Chinese person.
    - DevKoala 6y ago
      You keep comparing apples to oranges in order to fabricate an argument. There is no systemic genocide perpetrated by the USA. Maybe if you believed in your argument you’d reply with your real account, not a green one.
      - nerdtime 6y ago
        >Maybe if you believed in your argument you’d reply with your real account, not a green one. Looking at his karma which is barely anything in all accounts likely he has no real account. Also the usage of other accounts is likely a symptom of a post limit. Either he can respond to you with another account, or he can ignore you because he can't respond with the same account. Either way these actions are not sanctioned by the site. >You keep comparing apples to oranges in order to fabricate an argument. There is no systemic genocide perpetrated by the USA You can call it whatever you want. There was a sponsoring of troops by the US to slaughter people abroad for over a decade. Mass slaughter in the name of war rather than genocide. The chinese are not slaughtering people. They are putting them in concentration camps and educating them. Torture, Indoctrination and brainwashing are the more appropriate terms with the accurate sentiment. So yeah you're not wrong it is in way apples and oranges. Do you end terrorism by slaughtering terrorists? Or do you end terrorism by torturing, brainwashing and indoctrinating them? Pick the apple or the orange. Oh and in both cases there will be innocent bystanders affected.
bleepblorp 6y ago
15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens. US response towards Saudi can best be summarized as completely indifferent.