> That's a very common misconception of private copy; the existence of the private copy tax is not excusing copyright violation. You are wrongly assuming that

> That's a very common misconception of private copy; the existence of the private copy tax is not excusing copyright violation. You are wrongly assuming that a copyright violation has taken place. If a country's laws say it's legal to make a copy under specific circumstances, it's not a copyright violation to make a copy under those circumstances.