the fact that it will be unimaginably expensive is not the point: we don't have a choice. The issue raised by GP comment is how you allocate that insane expens

the fact that it will be unimaginably expensive is not the point: we don't have a choice. The issue raised by GP comment is how you allocate that insane expense. As I read it, they are only suggesting we spend on the most affordable technologies available to lessen the impact of climate change, not the most expensive.