Agreed. One of the delights of ambiguity is that it allows one to project one's own prejudices into the data. Allow me: For example, what does it mean that 3

Agreed. One of the delights of ambiguity is that it allows one to project one's own prejudices into the data. Allow me: For example, what does it mean that 31% of people want an Android phone but a whopping 50% of them buy one? Is it because the lower price is compelling undecideds to switch? Or is it because carriers promote Android in-store because the advertising rev. share is more profitable for them (see http://paidcontent.org/article/419-androids-secret-sauce-googles-little-known-advertising-rev-share-deals-/ http://paidcontent.org/article/419-androids-secret-sauce-goo...). Or is it simply that Android simply kicks ass? Or all three? But, on the other hand, what does it mean that the Android installed base is 37% greater than iPhone, but Android browser share is only 10% greater? Does that indicate that some people aren't using the smartphone features of Android, and instead are just buying them as cheap phones with cool cameras and email?