3 ms·
> The book was not peer reviewed by the New York Academy of Sciences.[2][9] Five reviews were published in the academic press, with four of them considering the
by vntok 6y ago
> The book was not peer reviewed by the New York Academy of Sciences.[2][9] Five reviews were published in the academic press, with four of them considering the book severely flawed and contradictory, and one praising it while noting some shortcomings.
- natmaka 6y agoPlease read: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24338414 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24338414