Its fairly common in fashion brands that the cheaper you get, the bigger the logo. Eg ralph lauren drops from massive, to small top left logo, to tiny, to entir

Its fairly common in fashion brands that the cheaper you get, the bigger the logo. Eg ralph lauren drops from massive, to small top left logo, to tiny, to entirely gone, on their polos as you scale the price range. The usual explanation is that, the less money you have, the more the brand values as a signal. As you get richer, the brand matters less than the material/cut/fit/etc. Though if you go too far, then it reverts back to the designer that matters