3 ms·
> Suppose you used SHA256(MD5(x)) as your sequential hashing function. SHA256(concat(MD5(x), x)) would be significantly more effective at the possible expense
by sjwright 6y ago
> Suppose you used SHA256(MD5(x)) as your sequential hashing function.
SHA256(concat(MD5(x), x)) would be significantly more effective at the possible expense of performance.
Of course I’m sure that if you’re willing to make a performance trade-off there’s going to be a better single hashing algorithm out there.