3 ms·

The idea of it is kind of farcical to being with. How do you verify hundreds of thousands of signatures in the first place? It might be a science at a forensic

The idea of it is kind of farcical to being with. How do you verify hundreds of thousands of signatures in the first place? It might be a science at a forensic level for investigations, but at this scale? I don't think so. Also while I'm not going to imply I'm a typical case, I am not capable of writing a consistent signature due to a neurological condition. I think I still deserve a vote.

rayiner 6y ago
Is it farcical? Signature verification is the only thing they use in Maryland. You just go up and write in your address and sign. I don’t know how reliable signatures are but people assure me that not requiring ID is fine because there are signatures: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/policy-brief-alternatives-voter-identification https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/poli... > Such signature comparison has long been deemed sufficiently reliable to legitimate absentee ballots and provisional ballots, and there is no reason to believe that it is any less reliable for confirming the identity of individuals voting in person.
- hellotomyrars 6y ago
  This says nothing about the process itself, just a simple statement that it works. Maybe an actual description of the process would be more convincing to me, but this by itself doesn’t mean anything to me.
akhosravian 6y ago
Washington uses signatures for our all mail in elections. When I’ve phoned in my signature (read just a line instead of something even vaguely resembling my usual mess) it has been challenged. I also forgot to sign/drop my ballot one time and had my wife sign it. That one was also challenged. When challenged you have to reaffirm you submitted the ballot. You only “lose” your vote if you fail to respond. YMMV but it seems to work pretty well here.
- hellotomyrars 6y ago
  This is my first time voting in Washington! That’s interesting to know. what method do they contact you to and how big is your window to respond?

rayiner 6y ago

Is it farcical? Signature verification is the only thing they use in Maryland. You just go up and write in your address and sign. I don’t know how reliable signatures are but people assure me that not requiring ID is fine because there are signatures: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/policy-brief-alternatives-voter-identification https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/poli... > Such signature comparison has long been deemed sufficiently reliable to legitimate absentee ballots and provisional ballots, and there is no reason to believe that it is any less reliable for confirming the identity of individuals voting in person.

hellotomyrars 6y ago
This says nothing about the process itself, just a simple statement that it works. Maybe an actual description of the process would be more convincing to me, but this by itself doesn’t mean anything to me.

akhosravian 6y ago

Washington uses signatures for our all mail in elections. When I’ve phoned in my signature (read just a line instead of something even vaguely resembling my usual mess) it has been challenged. I also forgot to sign/drop my ballot one time and had my wife sign it. That one was also challenged. When challenged you have to reaffirm you submitted the ballot. You only “lose” your vote if you fail to respond. YMMV but it seems to work pretty well here.

hellotomyrars 6y ago
This is my first time voting in Washington! That’s interesting to know. what method do they contact you to and how big is your window to respond?