3 ms·
I think in that case the copyright infringement would be the uploader rather than YouTube, but IANAL.
by slaymaker1907 6y ago
I think in that case the copyright infringement would be the uploader rather than YouTube, but IANAL.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- nullc 6y agoThere are CC-By-SA works uploaded to youtube by google employees while at work.
- kzrdude 6y agoI think you have a good case, if the copyright holder/author is also someone else than the uploader.
- wang_li 6y agoOnly if the employee is doing the upload as a function of their job can google have any liability. In any other circumstance google s protected by the safe harbor provisions of the law.