3 ms·
I like and agree with the article, but: an attempt was made to port part of that code (the planner) from Lisp to C++. After a year that effort had
by Tiomaidh 15y ago
I like and agree with the article, but:
an attempt was made to port part of that code (the
planner) from Lisp to C++. After a year that effort
had to be abandoned because the planner team just
couldn't make it work.
I'm sure they'd struggle just as much if the planner was written in assembly, and not because assembly is a far more elegant language...
- gloob 15y agoGiven that assembly is simpler than C++ both syntactically and semantically, a reasonable argument could be made that it is a more elegant language.