4 ms·
Not to be trite, but as they say, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Especially considering the sentences immediately after the "there is no evide
by jordan0day 16y ago
Not to be trite, but as they say, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Especially considering the sentences immediately after the "there is no evidence..." statement, I'd be wary. I might just be jaded and they're really just trying to be forthcoming and helpful, but all that CYA-type-speak after that line makes me at least a little bit dubious that they're revealing all the details just yet.
- wnoise 16y agoI've always hated that saying. Absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence, in situations where you would expect such evidence. It's absence of proof that isn't proof of absence.
- lotusleaf1987 16y agoThat was a c-c-c-combo breaker. Bravo at articulating that.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]