3 ms·
Ok, so who's building a distributed, cryptographic, uncensorable version of GitHub?
by jaspergilley 6y ago
Ok, so who's building a distributed, cryptographic, uncensorable version of GitHub?
- dakron 6y ago+1
- jitendrac 6y ago+1, This was the first thing came in mind after reading the article.
- snuxoll 6y agoKeybase, outside of the distributed bit along with the question of their future, provides zero-knowledge git repositories (they’ve literally got no idea what is in your repositories, including metadata).
- hombre_fatal 6y agoI doubt any of Keybase's features from flailing around to see what will stick will last much longer now that they've been bought by Zoom.
- Avamander 6y agoIt's on life-support, yes. Incredibly sad, it did IM very well and on top of it all, it had a bunch of very innovative features. And no, nothing really competes with it.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- bob1029 6y agoIMO, Git+blockchain is a pretty good match on paper.
- foepys 6y agoGit was blockchain before blockchain was cool.
- rektide 6y agohttps://github.com/cjb/GitTorrent/ https://github.com/cjb/GitTorrent/ was building a p2p git. https://github.com/forgefed/forgefed https://github.com/forgefed/forgefed is a github alike that is federated via ActivityPub. this distributes content to a bunch of servers, but it is not cryptographic, not meant to be censorship-resistant. i think this could be layered in to ActivityPub, particularly by making use of Signed HTTP Exchanges to verify content origin, & then you'd still need a way to find alive hosts.