I was doing some reading on Qanon. The weirdest part to me was how FEW correlations they have to offer. If I give a large group 4,000+ pieces of random informa

I was doing some reading on Qanon. The weirdest part to me was how FEW correlations they have to offer. If I give a large group 4,000+ pieces of random information and a multi-year block of history, I'd expect the number of interesting and surprising coincidences to be staggering. Instead, the "deltas" and obsession with 17 is weak at best. One could say that it is more interesting that so many Q posts somehow have so very little in common with anything at all.