3 ms·
> From a consumer perspective it does offer more comfort for a narrow sliver of affluent teenagers, and a possible service vehicle for companies, municipalities
by brmgb 6y ago
> From a consumer perspective it does offer more comfort for a narrow sliver of affluent teenagers, and a possible service vehicle for companies, municipalities etc.
I like how you casually toss that. This is not a detail. This is the core market of the car and it has been perfectly designed to address it.
This is a clean, compact, two seaters with a size and performance profile perfectly suited for a city looking like Paris. It's probably going to make a killing as a ride sharing solution.
It's a very interesting new value proposition (small, slow, clean, quite cheap) and it does so using an extremely aggressive engineering proposition (only 250 parts, perfectly symmetrical, similar front and back).
This car is a design master
class. The fact that you fail to see that is on you. Meanwhile it is selling very well.
- bborud 6y agoWhy do you assume that I don’t see that and people have not done made simple and cheap cars before? The difference is scale. Making a car relevant for a narrow demographic isn’t very impressive. Making a car that makes mobility for the masses is. I would encourage you to look a bit closer at cars that did this in the past.