4 ms·
Giant Bomb is reporting that passwords are supposedly secure (of course, "no way" is clearly false), so I'm guessing there's at least a decent salted hash: http
by estel 16y ago
Giant Bomb is reporting that passwords are supposedly secure (of course, "no way" is clearly false), so I'm guessing there's at least a decent salted hash: http://www.giantbomb.com/news/good-news-psn-back-maybe-within-a-week-bad-news-everything-else-updated/3084/ http://www.giantbomb.com/news/good-news-psn-back-maybe-withi...
- seiji 16y agoSalt is bad for you: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1209254 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1209254
- cookiecaper 16y agoSalted hashes are better than unsalted hashes.
- seiji 16y agoAgainst a GPU that can calculate five million hashes per second your salt isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
- jbri 16y agoI don't know about you, but personally I think "crack one person's password in one day" is a much better situation than "crack everyone's password in one day".
- ceejayoz 16y agoThat's why you use a different salt per user.
- perlgeek 16y agoWho prints out password salts anyway?
- phsr 16y agoSo we should just store the password in plain text then!! Or we could use the honor system, with no password!!
- TimothyBurgess 16y agoIf you insist on using fast hashes, a double salt double hash sandwich is what I use. sha1($Salt . sha1($Food . $Salt)) Something like this should be used at a minimum - maybe even toss some herbs and spices in there and hash it a couple more times for good measure. And I know this from my own experience in finding security holes. wink
- chrischen 16y agoI don't think he's reporting passwords are secure. He's just saying for people (like me) who forgot what their PSN password was have no way of figuring out.