3 ms·

Whatever you say dude. You're obviously trying to label everyone that disagrees with you as a violent extremist - you end every one of your comments like that.

Whatever you say dude. You're obviously trying to label everyone that disagrees with you as a violent extremist - you end every one of your comments like that. I don't know why you'd do that and I don't care it's just obvious and that's why everyone is downvoting you.

zepto 6y ago
I’m labelling you a violent extremist, because you said you don’t care if innocent people die as a result of your cause. I’m not sure why you think I’m labeling anyone else. Can you find one other comment where I have labeled anyone anything? It should be very easy if I end every one of my comments like that. Nobody else here has said they don’t care about innocent people dying. That is only you.
- MegaButts 6y ago
  Again, you're clearly baiting. I said I don't care about police dying, not people. The police can quit whenever they want. You keep twisting what people say only to respond with gotchas and try to wear down your opponents.
  - zepto 6y ago
    There is no twisting going on here. No gotchas. You are saying that you don’t care about police dying. I could point out that police are people, so what you are doing here is to dehumanize anyone who you consider to be police. However, I accept that you wouldn’t recognize that argument, because you then go on to say, that they can quit whenever they want. I.e. they can avoid being killed by simply making the choice not to be Police. This is the very definition of political violence - threatening the lives of people who support institutions you don’t like.
    - MegaButts 6y ago
      Again with the twisting of words. I'm not threatening anyone or advocating for violence, I'm saying I choose the people over the police.
      - zepto 6y ago
        “I'd prefer vigilante justice over that.” “I will always choose the people over the police, even if the people are violent. A public mob is better than a police mob.” “Until the police are held accountable to the public, I feel no remorse for anything that happens to them.” “the public needs to do it by whatever means necessary even if that harms innocent police officers” Seems pretty clear what you are advocating. You don’t have to say things like this if they aren’t what you mean.
        MegaButts 6y ago
        Yep - I stand by all that because I choose the public over the police. I don't care what happens to the police doesn't mean I want anything bad to happen, it means I don't care. If I say I don't care about you it doesn't mean I wish you harm it means I'm indifferent. I choose to help the people, not the police.
        zepto 6y ago
        Those are not statements of indifference. They are statements that advocate violence. Let’s consider an example: “the public needs to do it by whatever means necessary even if that harms innocent police officers” Advocating methods that knowingly include harming the innocent is advocating violence. You are clearly advocating violence. Why not just admit it?
        MegaButts 6y ago
        I'm not advocating violence. You're seeing what you want to see.
        6y ago

zepto 6y ago

I’m labelling you a violent extremist, because you said you don’t care if innocent people die as a result of your cause. I’m not sure why you think I’m labeling anyone else. Can you find one other comment where I have labeled anyone anything? It should be very easy if I end every one of my comments like that. Nobody else here has said they don’t care about innocent people dying. That is only you.

MegaButts 6y ago
Again, you're clearly baiting. I said I don't care about police dying, not people. The police can quit whenever they want. You keep twisting what people say only to respond with gotchas and try to wear down your opponents.
- zepto 6y ago
  There is no twisting going on here. No gotchas. You are saying that you don’t care about police dying. I could point out that police are people, so what you are doing here is to dehumanize anyone who you consider to be police. However, I accept that you wouldn’t recognize that argument, because you then go on to say, that they can quit whenever they want. I.e. they can avoid being killed by simply making the choice not to be Police. This is the very definition of political violence - threatening the lives of people who support institutions you don’t like.
  - MegaButts 6y ago
    Again with the twisting of words. I'm not threatening anyone or advocating for violence, I'm saying I choose the people over the police.
    - zepto 6y ago
      “I'd prefer vigilante justice over that.” “I will always choose the people over the police, even if the people are violent. A public mob is better than a police mob.” “Until the police are held accountable to the public, I feel no remorse for anything that happens to them.” “the public needs to do it by whatever means necessary even if that harms innocent police officers” Seems pretty clear what you are advocating. You don’t have to say things like this if they aren’t what you mean.
      - MegaButts 6y ago
        Yep - I stand by all that because I choose the public over the police. I don't care what happens to the police doesn't mean I want anything bad to happen, it means I don't care. If I say I don't care about you it doesn't mean I wish you harm it means I'm indifferent. I choose to help the people, not the police.
        zepto 6y ago
        Those are not statements of indifference. They are statements that advocate violence. Let’s consider an example: “the public needs to do it by whatever means necessary even if that harms innocent police officers” Advocating methods that knowingly include harming the innocent is advocating violence. You are clearly advocating violence. Why not just admit it?
        MegaButts 6y ago
        I'm not advocating violence. You're seeing what you want to see.
        6y ago