3 ms·
Here is the rest of the details from my developer on the project- What was our specific server size and setup and costs with RDS? We were using db.t3.medium
by silexia 6y ago
Here is the rest of the details from my developer on the project-
What was our specific server size and setup and costs with RDS?
We were using db.t3.medium (1 CPU, 2 vCPU, 4GB RAM), we were using a DB cluster that has 2 instances db.t3.medium overall cost (~$118 monthly)
And now with EC2?
We are using c5d.xlarge (4 CPU, 20 ECU, 8GB RAM), we are using one instance c5d.xlarge overall cost (~$140 monthly)
What was the big cost savings?
Our main issue was in I/O (Read and write), we have very high I/O demand so we was paying for I/O and storage (~$600) and the second issue is CPU credit (~$90 monthly) so the total save is ($600+$90+$118)-$140= $668 per month.
Also EC2 performance is better than RDS because we get a very good cheaper than RDS server.
Note:
RDS is configuration less and has support while if you want to use EC2 then you need a person to do configuration and support for DB on it.
- phonon 6y agoStill not clear what your major cost was. Were you using RDS Aurora, which has an IO fee? ($0.20 per 1 million requests?)
- silexia 6y agoYes, our major cost is IO and yes we are using Aurora and you are correct IO fee is $0.20 per 1 million requests.
- phonon 6y agoSo I suggest trying vanilla Postgres RDS, which doesn't have IO fees, but is still managed. Also, if you're doing such heavy IO, you might want to also look at I3en instances, which have fantastic IO using local storage.