> highly likely the anecdote is supposed to be illustrative rather than literal If it is a made up anecdote, that would be rather misleading under a headline t

> highly likely the anecdote is supposed to be illustrative rather than literal If it is a made up anecdote, that would be rather misleading under a headline that says "science-backed". The article argues that it's supported by data that focus on quantity leads to better quality than focus on quantity. It doesn't argue that it's merely a compelling idea that we should try for ourselves.