Are the terms unreasonable? If the terms were a limited license rather than an infinite guarantee to provide activation servers, then it’s not likely legally un

Are the terms unreasonable? If the terms were a limited license rather than an infinite guarantee to provide activation servers, then it’s not likely legally unreasonable. And it’s not at all uncommon to be the former. I’ve never seen a court rule a license like this to be unreasonable. Have you? Here’s [1] the CS3 license. It states a 90 day warranty, which is certainly legally a standard warranty. Section 14.8.1 states Adobe can disable the activation server. So yep, looks like this was covered in the license. I doubt a court is going to rule Adobe must provide a server indefinitely. [1] https://labs.adobe.com/technologies/eula/photoshopcs3.html https://labs.adobe.com/technologies/eula/photoshopcs3.html