3 ms·
> I'm really confused by that one. Google is a specialist in killing good products. They owned the news reader space and could probably have datamined it but k
by teruakohatu 6y ago
> I'm really confused by that one.
Google is a specialist in killing good products. They owned the news reader space and could probably have datamined it but killed Reader.
Edit: Removed a joke I made to avoid causing offense.
- viraptor 6y agoThey do kill projects, but these are not really comparable. People paid directly for Google music. They also did not really kill it, but rather replace with an inferior version aiming at the same business. This is not even comparable to the chat/hangouts/meet migration. I can find a reason, even if I don't agree with it, for most of their killed projects. This one is just... different.
- teruakohatu 6y agoI am sorry, I was trying to make a lighthearted joke but it must not have come across this way. I have removed the joke. > People paid directly for Google music In the case of many people they were paying for Youtube Premium and got Google Music for free.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> In the case of many people they were paying for Youtube Premium and got Google Music for free. In the case of many people, it worked the other way around.