3 ms·
> It's ironic that for a company that caters to designers, artists and product folks, all their products have such poor UI. That's not really who they're cater
by dorkwood 6y ago
> It's ironic that for a company that caters to designers, artists and product folks, all their products have such poor UI.
That's not really who they're catering to anymore, though. Not primarily, anyway. If you pay attention to the way Adobe communicates in recent years, it's all about the "democratization" of design tools. They want their new tech to look like magic to regular consumers. It doesn't need good UI. It doesn't need to help professionals work more efficiently. It just needs to help Joe Everyman use content-aware fill to remove the unwanted thing from his next Instagram upload. If they can do something in that vein once a month and keep the subscription rolling, then they're golden.
- cecja 6y agoyOu aRe NoT aN aRtIsT iF yOu UsE cOnTeNt AwArE fIlL
- egonschiele 6y agoDo you feel like they are succeeding at that? I've been using Adobe products since the early 2000s. I recently bought Premiere Elements and it was my first time doing any sort of video editing. I found it awful to use. I've switched to Final Cut and it's a ton better. iMovie was better too.
- dorkwood 6y ago> Do you feel like they are succeeding at that? Their record-breaking profits for the last few years in a row tell me 'yes'.