3 ms·
Funny enough, this is the exact same argument we use against state mass surveillance: " If you have nothing to hide, why refusing surveillance?" So police sho
by Hithredin 6y ago
Funny enough, this is the exact same argument we use against state mass surveillance:
" If you have nothing to hide, why refusing surveillance?"
So police should be exempted from mass surveillance ban ?!?
- avmich 6y agoPolice is here to serve the public, so naturally public may want to impose rules on police which it doesn't want to impose on itself. It all depends on who wants what (and for what).
- ben_w 6y ago> So police should be exempted from mass surveillance ban ?!? Whatever the solution ends up being, I want the police to be the same as everyone else with regard to that solution. I don’t really get normal human psychology, so I don’t know if everybody or nobody should have facial recognition software in public places, but I do think it should be a choice of “everybody or nobody”.