> What frustrates me about this whole argument over wealth taxes is that the arguments aren't grounded in facts. You say this, yet you don't provide a single c

> What frustrates me about this whole argument over wealth taxes is that the arguments aren't grounded in facts. You say this, yet you don't provide a single citation for any of your arguments. > There is a very strong case that one reason for sluggish economic growth is the concentration of assets and wealth in so few hands, and the continuing stagnation/decline in wealth/living standards/etc of bottom 40% of the US when measured in things like "healthcare", "education" etc. A redistributive wealth tax that was well structured could be a huge boon to GDP growth. This seems plausible, but not self-evident. Give us evidence.