5 ms·
Can you recommend which tool they used? Last time I looked (c.2018), the tools I found were not always reliable, or available for platforms like Windows. I'd l
by vintagedave 6y ago
Can you recommend which tool they used? Last time I looked (c.2018), the tools I found were not always reliable, or available for platforms like Windows.
I'd love to be able to use a dedicated transition tool of the quality FreeBSD would like and need.
- tannhaeuser 6y agoreposurgeon's home page is here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon/repository-editing.html http://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon/repository-editing.html Haven't used it myself though; I just noticed that ESR has spent considerable effort in creating reposurgeon.
- vintagedave 6y agoThankyou!
- vintagedave 6y agohttp://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon/repository-editing.html#_the_ontological_mismatch_problem_and_its_consequences http://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon/repository-editing.html... is a wonderful read. You are right, ESR has absolutely "spent considerable effort".
- jlgaddis 6y ago> Can you recommend which tool they used? From [0]: > The software used for the conversion is a slightly modified fork of svn2git, as used by the KDE project. > It requires a rules file to map svn trees and/or revisions to git branches or tags. The current rules don't make use of tags but simply store them as branches. > See the project branch at http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/uqs/git_conv/ http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/uqs/git_conv/ for extra patches, rules and the scripts used to do these conversions. -- [0]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow https://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow