> That means each person who reserved an Edition 1 could have bought a $30k car instead and the rest of the money could have bought a house for a homeless, Ins

> That means each person who reserved an Edition 1 could have bought a $30k car instead and the rest of the money could have bought a house for a homeless, Instead of attempting to control the luxury purchasing habits of the wealthy, we should instead just tax them more (their income/wealth, not the sale) rather than relying on their selective and conditional charity. I doubt the sales of these would drop much if we did.