3 ms·
I am mostly disappointed where this all ended up, especially with Netflix. The HTPC movement was all about serving up our bought content at top quality. Nowaday
by PaulKeeble 6y ago
I am mostly disappointed where this all ended up, especially with Netflix. The HTPC movement was all about serving up our bought content at top quality. Nowadays you don't own any content, you rent it all and its all streamed at poor bitrate with often worse audio options than what we had 20 years ago. Netflix instead of freeing existing content and spreading it across the globe ended up copying the cable company production of its own content and isolating that content to its own platform model to be sold with a monthly rental along with all its other content you don't want.
Very little of what the early HTPC movement and Jellyfin/Kodi are today has made it into the official streaming services and its every bit as geolocked as cable services were. Netflix is cable on the internet, none of the devices today are anything but multiple cable devices served over the internet, they share very little in principles with the early HTPC movement. DRM has become ever more prevalent in TV and movies not less.
- j0057 6y agoTV's are hopelessly underpowered computers as well, it easily takes 20 seconds to start the app for a streaming platform, and then input latency is really bad too. Really miserable UX.
- nailer 6y agoI've seen this work both ways. The original FireTV stick had awful latency, the 4K one is far smoother despite shifting four times as many pixels.
- sagarm 6y agoIMO a Netflix without original content would have a much harder time attracting new subscribers and retaining existing ones. They'd have to pay exorbitant rates for proven hits rather than paying less cash up front and offering creative freedom for original content.