I found it an interesting insight in to what 'A day in the life of.. ' is like for Criminal-Data Analyst. The way it put a human face on things made for an inte

I found it an interesting insight in to what 'A day in the life of.. ' is like for Criminal-Data Analyst. The way it put a human face on things made for an interesting read. True, it is just a blurb for the author's book but it made the very good point of - "Was the video altered?" "Kinda" aspect of trials and expert evidence in terms of establishing a Guilty or Not Guilty verdict versus being Guilty or Innocent. Sometimes it is the 'who had the better lawyer' that establishes the trial outcome. Would different questions have affected the outcome of the trial? I don’t think so. But shouldn’t a person who’s presumed innocent have access to someone like me, so those questions could be asked?