4 ms·
F-droid is one of those projects that could really do with more recurring donations. They are extremely unobtrusive about their donations. One of the devs actu
by black_puppydog 6y ago
F-droid is one of those projects that could really do with more recurring donations.
They are extremely unobtrusive about their donations.
One of the devs actually writes on his homepage [1] that he would like to work more on google free android, but is currently looking for funding.
But apart from that there's just a few buttons on the homepage sidebar.
I recently heard that these folks are running the entire operation mostly on goodwill, so I just took the time to look into it a bit.
They have about $110 of monthy recurring revenue on OpenCollective [2] and about $750 monthly recurring on liberapay [3]. That's not even one minimum wage salary. That's nothing.
They received big donation of 10K they got from Mozillas Opensource Speed dating session at FOSDEM this year [4] which is great. It's not recurring though from what I can see.
BUT: for being the one project that people (me included) point to when the question of a more open mobile platform arises, having the entire infrastructure (build servers, hosting, code, not to mention someone supervising the whole thing) be done by a handful of volunteers on a shoestring budget doesn't seem right.
Edit: I am aware there are many other open mobile projects and I love them to bits, but they are nowhere near as complete an experience as AOSP + f-droid. Personally, I don't really think of android (even without google and with f-droid) as a free platform, and I don't think that will ever change. So by all means, also donate to Mobian, UBports and all the others. :)
[1]: https://bubu1.eu/ https://bubu1.eu/
[2]: https://opencollective.com/f-droid#section-budget https://opencollective.com/f-droid#section-budget
[3]: https://liberapay.com/F-Droid-Data/donate https://liberapay.com/F-Droid-Data/donate ( €143.76/week * 52 / 12, converted to USD )
[4]: https://twitter.com/fdroidorg/status/1243499250551410688 https://twitter.com/fdroidorg/status/1243499250551410688
- enriquto 6y agoI'm surprised of these low numbers. How come the FSF does not aid this cornerstone project at all?
- usr1106 6y agoWell, FSF is highly ideological; not every FOSS project would match. I have no idea, whether F-Droid would match, I try to keep out of the heavy ideological arguments... Does FSF sponsor any projects? (Honest question, never thought about it...)
- gnufx 6y agoFiscal sponsorship: https://www.fsf.org/working-together/fiscal-sponsorship https://www.fsf.org/working-together/fiscal-sponsorship F-Droid seems approved as a repo for Replicant, despite its "features you may not like" (but free software) apps.
- usr1106 6y ago> Fiscal sponsorship Interesting. Unfortunately my first web search does not bring up a list of particpating projects, preferably with the amount in question, like e.g. https://spi-inc.org/corporate/annual-reports/2019.pdf https://spi-inc.org/corporate/annual-reports/2019.pdf
- swiley 6y agoF-droid is amazing for android. It's probably the one nice thing about the platform. lots of people have probably given up on android now though and there are multiple phones with support for a decent Linux distribution at this point.
- jmnicolas 6y ago> support for a decent Linux distribution Last time I checked (admittedly a few months ago) the Librem 5 was the most promising Linux phone but had trouble reliably making calls! Is there a fluid and reliable (hardware and software) Linux phone? At work we're deploying some stock Android Samsung Xcover4s and despite having good enough hardware on paper they feel really sluggish when using them (before any apps installed, fully updated, most bloatware removed with ADB). So if a 250€ Samsung with stock Android doesn't manage to be pleasant to use, I have doubts that a Linux phone will succeed but I would be happy to be wrong. I'm trying to degoogle my e-life, I'm planning to install GrapheneOS on my Pixel 4 XL but if there's a Linux phone that matches the user experience I may consider switching to that instead.
- corrund 6y agoYou are making typical mistake: Linux is joy to develop. Well developed Linux distribution is joy to use for users, but boring for developers. Currently, if you are young developer, you can have lot of joy with Linux on phone.
- Mediterraneo10 6y agoThose multiple phones with support for a decent Linux distribution, don't run certain important apps. OSMAnd beats any of the rudimentary map offerings on the Librem or the Pinephone, for instance. Consequently, in the short term Linux phone users are interested in running Android apps through emulation (Anbox, or Jolla's Android layer), and when you do that, you usually get the apps you need through F-Droid.
- gnufx 6y ago> OSMAnd beats any of the rudimentary map offerings on the Librem or the Pinephone Not to knock OSMAnd, but Ubports' Pure Maps isn't bad, is it?
- ShorsHammer 6y agoAnd yet some people are pulling in $30k a month selling photos of themselves in bikinis on OnlyFans. I try to be an optimist but sometimes it's hard to picture a bright future.
- myself248 6y agoSo, perhaps OnlyFans as a platform makes it easy, both in a logistical sense and a psychological one, to support creators you like with a recurring commitment. Are there any open-source platforms that nail both of those factors? Conclusion: Maybe F-Droid should be on OF.
- m-p-3 6y agoWithout them, we wouldn't have a reliable way of acquiring and updating apps that Google doesn't want on its platform like NewPipe.
- gnufx 6y ago> AOSP + f-droid It might or might not be considered significantly different from AOSP, and at least most of the free apps in their "store" must come from F-Droid, but there's /e/: https://e.foundation https://e.foundation Three cheers for F-Droid anyhow, and I'd have thought it should be mentioned under https://doc.e.foundation/projects-looking-for-contributors https://doc.e.foundation/projects-looking-for-contributors