3 ms·
Its a statement, not an argument, as I read it. Theyre ignoring other confounding factors, the agency of both telecoms and policy makers, and basing the lose-lo
by donavanm 6y ago
Its a statement, not an argument, as I read it. Theyre ignoring other confounding factors, the agency of both telecoms and policy makers, and basing the lose-lose-lose on a limited subset of auction markets. Additionally theres no other suggested mechanism besides a vague wave at “revenue sharing” where you have the same problem of determining what the appropriate rate is.