4 ms·
ABSOLUTELY. Comment scores in the midst of an active discussion narrow thinking. Comment scores on historical artifacts are useful for research.
by raganwald 16y ago
ABSOLUTELY.
Comment scores in the midst of an active discussion narrow thinking. Comment scores on historical artifacts are useful for research.
- cyanbane 16y agoI think if people in general see a comment that has been upvoted heavily they are less likely to contribute their opinion to it if they agree with it. I like not being able to see its weight as I feel like more readers will comment with their opinions rather than just upvote, which creates more discussion, etc (I have no numbers to back this up, just what I believe).
- rb01usa 16y agoThis is true for me--I have felt more encouraged to contribute to discussions now that the votes are hidden as opposed to before; As long as the higher voted comments bubble up to the top I don't see a reason to see the votes count with a comment.
- jaxn 16y agoThat sound like it worsens the signal/noise ratio. If a comment is definitive (and ratified by up votes) then there would be fewer comments reiterating the point. Are we going for more informative or more participatory?
- raquo 16y agoSo the evident solution then would be to show comment scores after X (24?) hours since the news item was posted.
- hernan7 16y agoMore like after 1 week, I would say, but yes.
- lwhi 16y agoResearch into what?