> A starting investment of that size probably qualifies it for a record in the fat (as distinct from lean) startup size category as well. With that kind of fun

> A starting investment of that size probably qualifies it for a record in the fat (as distinct from lean) startup size category as well. With that kind of funding, and given who the founders are, maybe “startup” shouldn’t be used at all? The linked article didn’t use that term, and I mean, a startup that becomes worth $1B is called a “unicorn”, and this venture was launched with more funding than that.