Is there a technical issue where an authoritative source responding to the issue gets obscured? That sounds kind of intentional. If people are only replying to

Is there a technical issue where an authoritative source responding to the issue gets obscured? That sounds kind of intentional. If people are only replying to the claim and never even see the authoritative proof it seems very bad. Maybe it's a Hard Problem. I've seen people send me twitter links as evidence and it's just embarrassingly wrong. Like the sources in the twitter posts didn't even say something related to the claim the twitter post did. It was weird that it was viewed so uncritically by people quite familiar with the internet in general.