3 ms·
No, but that actually sounds like a good idea. If there are a lot of people using this data along with WikiData, or if there's a kind of standard for "big" ency
by prohobo 6y ago
No, but that actually sounds like a good idea. If there are a lot of people using this data along with WikiData, or if there's a kind of standard for "big" encyclopedic data, then I'd definitely like to support it.
- abraxaz 6y agoSemantic Web Technology (RDF/OWL/SPARQL) is kind of that, used by WikiData and search engines (schema.org) among others (e.g. https://api.parliament.uk/sparql https://api.parliament.uk/sparql, https://data.gov.uk/dataset/6efafa3b-ec10-4e11-82a2-b4724dd52d24/statistics-sparql-api https://data.gov.uk/dataset/6efafa3b-ec10-4e11-82a2-b4724dd5...). If you make data available as RDF (which for JSON only involves creating a JSON-LD context mostly) then it makes it very easy for others to integrate with data from other sources as that is one of the key challenges that Semantic Web technology is designed to solve.