AGPL is compatible with the OSI's definition of "open-source". Those other two licenses you listed are either fully non-commercial (polyform) or have a clause

AGPL is compatible with the OSI's definition of "open-source". Those other two licenses you listed are either fully non-commercial (polyform) or have a clause preventing cloud hosting SaaS (timescale). I am not going to get into discussion about who has the right to define "open-source", but having the right to commercially profit off of the software is one of the key OSI defined tenets which those two licenses lack. In the end, AGPL may be able to achieve the same goal of preventing parasitic SaaS solutions that don't contribute back into the community.