> This is because "Trash" is just a label. Typical "smart" solution, that completely fails when meeting the real world. I wonder how many horrible software is

> This is because "Trash" is just a label. Typical "smart" solution, that completely fails when meeting the real world. I wonder how many horrible software issues we've created trying to force smart/elegant solutions and then having either to: completely rebuild the feature, create horrible workarounds, or just let users deal with it however they can (which seems it's the Gmail way).