Honestly, the title is very sensasionalistic. It tries to make it sound like you tried to enforce patents on a Dropbox clone or something, while the truth is t

Honestly, the title is very sensasionalistic. It tries to make it sound like you tried to enforce patents on a Dropbox clone or something, while the truth is that the software was a parasitic service incapable of existing without Dropbox itself. To me that last part makes irrelevant that the software was OSS or not.