3 ms·
> throwing them in jail I hear this a lot - but what actual, specific crime did they commit that warrants a custodial sentence? What exact law or regulation in
by DaiPlusPlus 6y ago
> throwing them in jail
I hear this a lot - but what actual, specific crime did they commit that warrants a custodial sentence? What exact law or regulation in the US Federal Code did they break?
The evidence of their malfeasance is plain to see, but malfeasance itself isn't illegal - nor is harming the public-at-large indirectly through legal business planning and legal business deals. As it is, I don't believe there is a law against establishing corporate sales targets for harmful prescription drugs or fostering an internal company culture that encourages their overprescription. Nor do I believe is it illegal for drugs companies to give unintentionally misleading - or even intentionally misleading - marketing material to doctors and pharmacists because there's so much current legal leeway (for reasons I won't get into).
- Judgmentality 6y ago> what actual, specific crime did they commit that warrants a custodial sentence? As another commenter pointed out: > Conviction of 3 felonies including conspiracy to defraud the United States and yet no one is going to jail. Those are crimes punishable by prison sentences, if the judge so chooses to enforce the law. I bet nobody lost their right to vote either, despite the felonies. Admittedly I am not a lawyer, and I am definitely not an expert on Citizens v. United (which is essential to the arguments being made here), but I still don't believe they couldn't be put in jail - all it would take is for the judge to have a motivation to do so.