> Why would I use Inuit.css instead of Blueprint ( http://www.blueprintcss.org/ http://www.blueprintcss.org/ )? Make your viewport smaller than the default pa

> Why would I use Inuit.css instead of Blueprint ( http://www.blueprintcss.org/ http://www.blueprintcss.org/ )? Make your viewport smaller than the default page width of the website. Do you see horizontal scroll bars? yes for bluebprint, no for innuit. Which makes innuit the clear winner for me. Some weeks ago I spent some time skimming through various CSS frameworks, and ended up usinig emastic ( http://code.google.com/p/emastic/ http://code.google.com/p/emastic/ ) because it can be made to work well with small browser viewports, and because you can use em/ex instead of px for denoting sizes.