This is so cherry-picked and editorialized that this feels unethical. It claims an "average" from this list while intentionally neglecting less-successful IPOs

This is so cherry-picked and editorialized that this feels unethical. It claims an "average" from this list while intentionally neglecting less-successful IPOs and downright failures. Also, I'd be curious to see what the exits are after the 3-6 month lockup period. Some startups IPO decently, but then tank.