4 ms·
So $225M lawbreaking fee on $11B? Maybe 2.25B on 11B if you count the company bk, if they were still invested. edit: the above seems wrong. More like $8B + 2.2
by waterfowl 6y ago
So $225M lawbreaking fee on $11B? Maybe 2.25B on 11B if you count the company bk, if they were still invested.
edit: the above seems wrong. More like $8B + 2.25 maybe?
https://www.forbes.com/profile/sackler/#bf7fa1c5d631 https://www.forbes.com/profile/sackler/#bf7fa1c5d631
- germinalphrase 6y agoNYTimes quoted 8.3 billion in fines. From NYTimes: “ Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, has agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges and face penalties of roughly $8.3 billion, the Justice Department announced on Wednesday, a move that could pave the way for a settlement of thousands of lawsuits brought against the company for its role in the opioids epidemic. The company’s owners, members of the wealthy Sackler family, will pay $225 million in civil penalties. Federal prosecutors said the settlement did not preclude criminal charges against Purdue executives or individual Sacklers.”
- HappySweeney 6y agoIt still leaves $2.7 billion profit and no jail time.
- bilbo0s 6y agoIt's a slap in the face. Plus this is only for Purdue. How many other companies pumped opioids into the medical system? Not a peep out of law enforcement at all. You can wake a judge in the middle of the night to send 2 swat teams on a dynamic entry to get a 16 year old with 12 oz of cannabis. But the guys pumping over 90% of the opioids in the medical system? Crickets. That's where you know that money talks in America.
- geodel 6y ago> That's where you know that money talks in America. Is there any place where money does not talk?
- tyfon 6y agoWould it be possible for the victims to sue them now since criminal actions have been proven?
- randomfool 6y agoNo, it leaves $10.5B profit to the family since they've already drained $10.7B from the company and are only being fined $225M themselves. The family will lose control of the company but they knew this was coming and drained it ahead of time. DoJ is letting them get away with it.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- randomfool 6y ago$8.3B is extremely misleading- the article says it won't happen. "A forensic audit last year by Purdue found that the Sacklers directed at least $10.7 billion in the company’s proceeds to family-controlled trusts and holding companies" So the family extracts $10.7B from the company and pays a $225M fine. The company is fined $8.3B but most likely goes bankrupt because it's already been drained by the family.