I think there are a lot of other interesting applications here too: * "drive-by-wire" optimization of operator inputs to save on fuel or reduce machine wear *

I think there are a lot of other interesting applications here too: * "drive-by-wire" optimization of operator inputs to save on fuel or reduce machine wear * failsafe gps boundaries to prevent the chance of equipment leaving the operating zone * smart personnel and equipment tracking to avoid collisions or accidents in the workplace * future reduction in cost of remote-only equipment - cabins along with everything else needed for "creature comfort" requirements is probably a notable percentage in bill of materials and related shipping/running costs. * cheaper labor operating costs - jobsite risks, repetitive-stress-injuries and operator insurance would go down for sure - it's also safe to assume savings by employing drivers from anywhere vs localized and often remote * uptime: machines can run 24/7 with the exception of fueling - no downtime to change drivers or have a driver ferry back and forth for a shift change * easy path to automation, even if extremely limited in scope during first iterations it is reasonable to see how simple tasks such as repositioning and repetitive tasks could be automated, even with macros. * Having deeper telemetry about equipment operation (how many lb-ft has the forklift lifted in the last 3 months, how much time did the loader spend idling, how quickly did the machine respond to X input, what are the outliers for this machine vs all the other models in the fleet) can lead to much improved maintenance and preventive repairs. Maintenance programs in most cases today are simply based on hours and only the manufacturer or dealer would see anything beyond that with regards to machine usage. Larger manufacturers seem to be exploring this and offering remote operating consoles as an add-on but it seems pretty far behind.