>Because it's a huge financial It shouldn't be. From my experience, the financial cost that comes from increasing the number of people you fire after a few wee

>Because it's a huge financial It shouldn't be. From my experience, the financial cost that comes from increasing the number of people you fire after a few weeks is less than what companies spend furiously guarding against making a bad hire. >and organisational burden on the hirer There's no reason this needs to be the case.