5 ms·

>But Julia is strictly superior to Python in everyway That is until you use the debugger.

• FridgeSeal 6y ago
  The debugger has had a huge amount of work done on it recently. Anyway, half the data-scientists I know don't use the debugger, they're solidly in the print-to-debug camp, or they're using notebooks and going step-by-step.
  • smabie 6y ago
    Hell half the programmers I know don't ever use a debugger. I usually prefer to just think about my code and add some print statements, but occasionally I get super frustrated and throw up my hands. Feels like a personal failing on my part though.
• siproprio 6y ago
  >>But Julia is strictly superior to Python in everyway >That is until you use the debugger. Or stumble into the first example in JuliaPlots, which doesn't work.
  • smabie 6y ago
    What example are you referring to?
  • dunefox 6y ago
    The first example here (https://docs.juliaplots.org/latest/ https://docs.juliaplots.org/latest/) is the Lorentz attractor - just tried it in 1.5 and it works.