4 ms·
Intel pretty much stopped being relevant to the consumer SSD market as soon as the SSD market as a whole broadened enough to support the development of client/c
by wtallis 6y ago
Intel pretty much stopped being relevant to the consumer SSD market as soon as the SSD market as a whole broadened enough to support the development of client/consumer-specific SSD controllers. Once Intel could no longer compete by stripping a few features out of an enterprise SSD design, their consumer SSD products had no real advantage over other brands. (Minor exception: Intel's consumer QLC NVMe drives have consistently had very good retail prices.)
- junar 6y agoIf you mean the 660p/665p, I think even those SSDs are not worth it. The Kingston A2000 uses the same SM2263 controller, is about the same price, but uses TLC NAND instead of QLC.
- icegreentea2 6y agoOh totally. By the time I actually had my own money to buy an SSD (so like 2013 or so), Intel was completely out of the running (I went for a Crucial). As you said, I remember looking at some reviews last year and being surprised that Intel was in the running at all in any category.
- fomine3 6y agoIntel 600p was a disaster. I'm curious why they designed such product for first NVMe drive.
- wtallis 6y agoIntel pretty much didn't design it. It wasn't worthwhile for them to invest in making a consumer-oriented NVMe SSD controller of their own. Instead, they used the first NVMe SSD controller from Silicon Motion, whose SATA SSD controllers Intel had been using for a while. That SM2260 NVMe controller was cheap but bad, because it was made on a 40nm process (compared to 28nm or smaller for most NVMe controllers) and it was Silicon Motion's very first NVMe controller so they had lots of bugs.