3 ms·

Here's another one: https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&client=firefox-b-m&ei=Dcx-X7D5CoyorgT7q7vQAQ&q=%22express-http-proxy%22+%22logging%22&oq=%22expre

Here's another one: https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&client=firefox-b-m&ei=Dcx-X7D5CoyorgT7q7vQAQ&q=%22express-http-proxy%22+%22logging%22&oq=%22express-http-proxy%22+%22logging%22&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIECAAQRzIECAAQRzIECAAQRzIECAAQRzIECAAQRzIECAAQRzIECAAQRzIECAAQR1AAWABgzH1oAHADeACAAQCIAQCSAQCYAQCqAQdnd3Mtd2l6yAEIwAEB&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjws9CoyKTsAhUMlIsKHfvVDhoQ4dUDCAw&uact=5 https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&client=firefox-b-m... It is a search for "express-http-proxy" "logging" but at leat I got maybe one relevant result and a bunch of wildly unrelated ones, despite doublequotes.

IndexPointer 6y ago
Do you have an example of a page that is a good result for that query?
- eitland 6y ago
  There was one among the top 10 when I did the search. As for most of the rest of the first 10, null would have been a valid, more correct and generally better result! I actually wasted several minutes on one of them right away since I haven't still gotten into the habit of verifying every single Google result to se that it actually is what I asked for and not whatever filler Google decided to use this time. Not that it should be necessary, - they had this sorted back before 2010! Seriously: why can't Google or DDG get this right anymore?