3 ms·
> ... code-behind ... > We need an Access for the web, but nothing comes close. You're using ASP.NET terminology (code-behind) and implying that Access was so
by fizixer 6y ago
> ... code-behind ...
> We need an Access for the web, but nothing comes close.
You're using ASP.NET terminology (code-behind) and implying that Access was some sort of DB revolution on the desktop.
About time to get out of your bubble.
- teilo 6y agoI'm using the term generically, and you have no idea what you are talking about. Access was a DB revolution on the desktop. And that was both good and bad, as anyone who has had to migrate complex legacy Access apps to MSSQL will tell you. As for my "bubble," stop being so judgmental. You have no idea what my background is. I'm primarily a Python dev, specializing in systems integration.