3 ms·
>but the benefits will be reaped by the largest of corporations. What isn't? But you're also ignoring the fact that these benefits will also be reaped by end-
by M2Ys4U 6y ago
>but the benefits will be reaped by the largest of corporations.
What isn't?
But you're also ignoring the fact that these benefits will also be reaped by end-users - and more by people who have poor connections to the Internet.
>Is it worth it? Maybe for end users (who will get their web page in 485 ms instead of 500ms), but for developers it is not.
The Internet is for End Users,[0] not for developers. UX >>> DX.
[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8890 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8890
- krzyk 6y agoMy concern is that the benefit is minor, 3% faster web page download? And I wrote that big corporations, because those have millions of users, if users download faster then they can server even more users on smaller amount of hardware. 3% less hardware, that might be big if you are big. And considering it is developed by Google and pushed into Chrome they will get that benefit sooner than others.