There are many reasons to vote NO on 22, beyond the tasteless tactics being used to promote it. One example I haven't seen discussed much is that it requires t

There are many reasons to vote NO on 22, beyond the tasteless tactics being used to promote it. One example I haven't seen discussed much is that it requires that any future changes Business and Professions Code chapter 10 require a seven-eighths vote and that the changes be "consistent with and furthers the purpose of" the chapter. So not only is this a gross law that special cases particular businesses, but it's a nearly impossible to overturn suicide pact to do so.